Optical Triggering
Results
Coil B
Again we can compare
the maximum muzzle speeds obtained open loop triggering and optical triggering.
Table 1 shows the resulting speeds for each projectile type.
Projectile |
Open Loop Speed (m/s)
|
Optical Speed (m/s) |
Difference (%) |
Solid |
8.93E+0 |
8.58E+0 |
4.08E+0 |
4 mm Cored |
9.35E+0 |
8.96E+0 |
4.35E+0 |
6 mm Cored |
9.80E+0 |
9.36E+0 |
4.70E+0 |
Table
1. Comparison of maximum open loop speed and optical speed.
Now
we can see that the optical method gives a slightly lower muzzle speed with this
coil. The difference is small and indicates that the optical timing setup is close
to ideal.
Looking
at the operating curves in fig 1 shows that the difference between the supply
power and the source power is increasing due to the greater current demand.

Fig
1. Voltage, current and power curves.
Table
2 contains details of the energy and efficiencies for a solid projectile.
Source Energy
(mJ) |
Supply Energy
(mJ) |
Projectile Energy
(mJ) |
Coilgun Efficiency
(%) |
Overall System
Efficiency (%) |
1.48E+4 |
1.29E+4 |
2.87E+2 |
3.62E+0 |
3.16E+0 |
Table
2. Efficiency comparisons for solid projectile.
We
can see that all the efficiency ratings for coil B are somewhat better than those
for coil A, also, the proportional difference in efficiencies has increased as
expected.
|